The atomic bombs on japan justified history essay

In order to avoid such a high casualty rate, Truman decided—over the moral reservations of Secretary of War Henry Stimson, General Dwight Eisenhower and a number of the Manhattan Project scientists—to use the atomic bomb in the hopes of bringing the war to a quick end.

When the controversy died down, the Smithsonian elected not to stage any exhibit of the aircraft fuselage. This meant the Army or Navy could veto any decision by having its Minister resign, thus making them the most powerful posts on the SWC. The president said no more than that we had a new weapon which we planned to use in Japan.

Without them, hundreds of thousands of civilians in Malaya and Singapore, and millions in Japan itself, would have perished. It was not right and it was not necessary.

Truman chose the usage of atomic bomb on Japan to end the war quickly, by doing this, he saved tenth of thousands of American soldiers lives. On December 7th,Pearl Harbour was struck by Japanese forces. Every man, woman, and child would have resisted that invasion with sticks and stones if necessary Because the United States Army Air Forces wanted to use its fission bombs on previously undamaged cities in order to have accurate data on nuclear-caused damage, KokuraHiroshimaNagasakiand Niigata were preserved from conventional bombing raids.

Many critics noted, rightly, that the SBS was itself hardly a disinterested document, since it was produced by an organization with an interest in emphasizing the effectiveness of conventional airpower.

Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

In fact, as the documentary record shows, there was a good deal of debate over the use of the weapons during the summer ofmuch of which focused on more complex issues than the lives that would be saved or lost in ending the war.

The design for the exhibit quickly triggered an avalanche of controversy. The bombs have been affecting the new born babies up to today. Nimitz, from whose jurisdiction the atomic strikes would be launched, was notified in early Embracing the variety of opinions while also presenting a narrative that depicts the decision and its effects from multiple perspectives is a near-impossible task.

Supporters might say that US had dropped atomic bomb to end the war quickly and to save lives. In the Dutch East Indiesthere was a "forced mobilization of some 4 million—although some estimates are as high as 10 million—romusha manual laborers This implied the two planned campaigns to conquer Japan would cost 1.

The fallout from the controversy led to loud, public debate in the halls of Congress and, ultimately, to the resignation of several leaders at the museum. But life for life, the odds were that it would cost less. It is clear from these accounts that while many in the civilian government knew the war could not be won, the power of the military in the Japanese government kept surrender from even being considered as a real option prior to the two atomic bombs.

Japan could legally enter into a peace agreement only with the unanimous support of the Japanese cabinet, and in the summer ofthe Japanese Supreme War Council, consisting of representatives of the Army, the Navy and the civilian government, could not reach a consensus on how to proceed.

The declaration stated, "The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction. His stated intention in ordering the bombings was to save American lives, to bring about a quick resolution of the war by inflicting destruction, and instilling fear of further destruction, sufficient to cause Japan to surrender.

However, Japanese diplomatic messages regarding a possible Soviet mediation—intercepted through Magicand made available to Allied leaders—have been interpreted by some historians to mean, "the dominant militarists insisted on preservation of the old militaristic order in Japan, the one in which they ruled.

Another reason that is often used to justify the dropping of the bomb is that America wanted to show the USSR how powerful they were. The atomic barely got the Japanese to surrender.

Cunningham, an intelligence officer of the Fifth Air Forcenoted that in addition to civilians producing weapons of war in cities, the Japanese government created a large civilian militia organization in order to train millions of civilians to be armed and to resist the American invaders.

If the atomic bomb had not been used, evidence like that I have cited points to the practical certainty that there would have been many more months of death and destruction on an enormous scale.

Their proposed exhibit portrayed the development of the atomic weapons as a triumph of American technical ingenuity, and the use of both bombs as an act that saved lives—the lives of American soldiers who would otherwise have had to invade the Japanese home islands, and the lives of thousands of Japanese who would, it was assumed, have fought and died with fanatic determination opposing such an invasion.

Defeated Japanese leaders preferred to take their own lives in the painful samurai ritual of seppuku called hara kiri in the West.The decision to employ atomic weapons against Japan remains a controversial chapter in American history.

Even before the new President Harry S. Truman finalized his decision to use the bombs, members of the President’s inner circle grappled with the specifics of the decision to drop the new weapon.

Was the Dropping of the Usa Bomb on Japan Justified?

The Dropping of the Atomic Bombs on Japan Essay - The Dropping of the Atomic Bombs on Japan The end of the World War 2 was inevitably close. The United States and its allies ripped through the European countryside and annihilated the German Army.

Did the USA need to drop bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in ? On the 6th of Augustthe US dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima,1ushering in the nuclear age.

Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Was the dropping of the atomic bombs justified? Essay Harbour the prior day. On December 7th, it certainly was justified. The United States and Japan were at war for several years, along with many other countries.

The Allies were justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Published: Mon, 5 Dec On 6 Augustthe first atomic bomb to be dropped on foreign soil was released from Enola Gay on Hiroshima, Japan.

This nuclear bomb, named Little Boy was dropped as a devastating attack in an attempt to make Japan surrender, and destroyed Hiroshima as over 70, people were instantly killed. - President Harry Truman’s use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during the Second World War is the most controversial decision in history.

While it was an undoubtedly difficult decision, it was indeed necessary in order to end this six-year war that had ravaged the world.

The atomic bombs on japan justified history essay
Rated 5/5 based on 26 review